This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Dear {{ first_name | reader }},

This isn't a regular edition. No crisis debrief, no framework, no research findings. Just a tool and an honest explanation of why it exists.

A few weeks ago I built something. A structured AI skill, a set of instructions you install into Claude, that turns it into a sharp-elbowed press release editor.

The kind that refuses to start writing until it's asked you the uncomfortable questions. The kind that bans 'world-class' and 'innovative' and 'we are committed to transparency'. 🥱

The kind that forces you to answer who your real audience is – not the journalist but the person behind the journalist – and what exactly you want them to think, feel, or do differently.

It took a while to get right. It has been battle tested. I'm giving it away for free.

Here's why.

I wrote a few weeks ago about the line between intelligence and judgement, the argument that AI is absorbing the pattern-recognition, research, and formatting work of our profession, leaving the strategic calls to those who have the experience to make them.

Press releases were right there in my argument. I called it intelligence work. I'll go further: writing them is not a value-added activity. It never really was. It was always the thinking behind them that mattered; the audience, the angle, the judgement call about what to say and what to leave out.

But here's what I didn't say clearly enough: intelligence work done badly still causes damage.

A press release written by someone who doesn't understand the audience chain fails the organisation it was supposed to serve. A quote that sounds like it was written by a committee rather than a human being erodes credibility quietly, over time, in ways that are hard to trace back to the source.

The skill exists because there's a right way and a wrong way to do even the operational work. And because a generation of communicators (the one I wrote about, the one that deserves better tools than we had) shouldn't have to learn the hard way that 'innovative solutions provider' is a phrase that makes journalists delete emails.

So. Here it is.

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to Wag The Dog Newsletter to continue reading.

I consent to receive newsletters via email. Terms of use and Privacy policy.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading